Comparison of Postmodernist Historians of Pakistan
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
History of Pakistan has been really complex and every time a historian tried to write about a historical event, it did come under fire of criticism. Critiques roused questions whether history or the events a historian gives off are right, based on solid truths or delusions. The historians tried their best to write down the historical events of Pakistan. There have been conventional or traditional writers and also there are writers who have marked history in a postmodern approach. At the end it is always up to the readers that how they perceive history depending on what approach they believe in. But there has always been a need to compare the historians of Pakistan in order to differentiate between their works and make it easier for the common men to choose in what they believe is true and what is not according to literature they have. Pakistan has made both conventional and modernist writers of history. There are famous names that have extraordinary work regarding the history of Pakistan. There is much appreciated and can be compared in regarding their postmodernist approach to history. Critics have criticized their work one way or other but there has been very less positive comparison between these renowned historians. Although there work is really deep and puts realities portrayed already into question but there is a need for a comparison among the works of these historians. It is necessary to have a deeper look into the frame works of the historians of Pakistan individually and then compare it with each other. A framework of comparison has been provided to conclude the approaches used by historians of Pakistan and which was better or not in writing the history of Pakistan. It’s up to readers in the end and their outlook on history after studying the available literature about the history.