COMPARING THE IMPACTS OF COLLABORATIVE AND BOSSY MANAGEMENT APPROACHES IN ENHANCING QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION

Abstract

The study outlines the practicality and effects of collaborative/proximate management style that the amount it is fruitful in the quality higher education when contrasted with bossy approach. It was conducted on one hundred male and female college heads and one hundred teachers simultaneously. The data was assembled through questionnaires administered on faculty and heads with regard to the executives approaches they embrace, for example, proximate/collaborative or bossy to decide impacts. The results reflect that the greater part of subjects favors collaborative/proximate management style for achieving distinctive educational benefits when compared with bossy approach which gives oppressive or absolutist impact on the colleagues and students and hampers accomplishing scholarly and administrative greatness. Thus, collaborative style affects peers and understudies' scholastic and expert accomplishments and supports to achieve high instructive principles. Consequently, the study suggests that public college heads should be offered more management related training courses in their profession to figure out how to carry on executing collaborative administration approach for achieving high standards to ensure quality higher education.